合伙创业有很多优势，是创业者比较喜欢的模式，同时也是比较容易出问题的合作模式，其中的股权设计是非常关键的因素之一。一个可能合作成功的企业必须具备以下几个条件：

Partnership entrepreneurship has many advantages, which is a preferred mode for entrepreneurs, and it is also a cooperation mode prone to problems, in which the equity design is one of the key factors. An enterprise that may cooperate successfully must have the following conditions:

1、必须有一个“带头大哥”。

1. There must be a "big brother in the lead.".

2、要有一帮志同道合的“小兄弟”。

2. We should have a group of like-minded "little brothers".

3、大家都有一个创业者心态。

3. We all have an entrepreneur mentality.

4、要分工明确。

4. The division of labor should be clear.

5、股权设计要合理。

5. Equity design should be reasonable.

那么怎样进行股权设计才合理呢？，“带头大哥”一定要保持着大股东身份，其次，要让小兄弟们有安全感。合伙人在5个人以下时，“带头大哥”的股份通常要超过51%，如果合伙人超过5个人以上，“带头大哥”的股份可以不超过51%，这样那些小兄弟们就会感觉到安全，不会轻易闹掰。换一个角度来看，不给“带头大哥”权力其实也是对他的一种保护，因为权力会产生绝对的腐败。另一方面，这样的股权设计使得小兄弟们也可以提意见，大家都会有参与感和成就感，有助于团队凝聚。

So how to carry out the equity design is reasonable? First of all, the "leading big brother" must maintain the identity of a major shareholder, and second, let the little brothers have a sense of security. When there are less than five partners, the shares of "leading brother" usually exceed 51%. If there are more than five partners, the shares of "leading brother" may not exceed 51%. In this way, those little brothers will feel safe and will not quarrel easily. From another point of view, not giving the "leading brother" power is actually a kind of protection for him, because power will produce absolute corruption. On the other hand, this kind of equity design enables the younger brothers to put forward their opinions. Everyone will have a sense of participation and achievement, which is conducive to team cohesion.

同时，“带头大哥”的存在也让这群人很自然的就有了主心骨，不会出现谁都想说了算的僵局，也不会出现群龙无首、互相争斗的局面。三个创始人的股权分别为40%、30%、30%，典型的没有大股东的股权设计，缺少了一个“带头大哥”，以至于在后来的发展过程中，冲突不断，矛盾加深，公司刚刚走上正轨，其中一个创始人就被踢出门，创始人团队分崩离析。

Meanwhile, no leader in brother has the backbone of the group. No one has the final say to resolve the deadlock and no fighting will be seen. The equity of the three founders is 40%, 30% and 30% respectively. There is no typical equity design of major shareholders, and there is no "leading big brother". As a result, in the later development process, conflicts continue and deepen. As soon as the company is on the right track, one of the founders is kicked out, and the founder team falls apart.